It is, however, true that "I shall be the Conqueror" and "Victory" are less dis-jointed. Now how does this affect us? Is it preferable to the driving directions from the McReynolds former residence in Boulder to the Ramsey home? Yes. Those directions would be SBTC but the word 'victory' seems unrelated. Now is this "interesting"? Yes!! Is it significant? Well, I sure don't think it changes his ex-wife's degree of certainty about his whereabouts.

I would wonder what computer could march through some suspects background scribblings and come up with an SBTC and also come up with an SBTC that was somewhat closely allied with the word victory.
Would McReynold's articles be fertile ground? Fleet White's royalty reports? Gary Oliva's rambling tapes about macaroon interviews? Some babbling idiot in a bakery who is interviewing a macaroon could well be uttering something that would fit the "sbtc" and "victory" goals.

Okay. Enough. I agree. Everytime I type "Kreepy" in reference to Karr it is an affirmation that the guy is a demented two-faced pervert, but it doesn't change his geographical whereabouts in December of 1996. As it turns out, Karr would have dearly loved to have been somewhere in Colorado then but he wasn't. No matter how closely linked his yearbook scribblings are to the word 'victory'.

Don, please tell me more about the McReynolds' driving directions.

The former address of the McReynolds home in Boulder is just a tad bit under three miles from the former Ramsey home (and crime scene).
The two houses are ofcourse also separated by time as well as by distance.

If you go to any source such as Google maps or a printed atlas or any similar source and look at the two locations and look at the various street names you will see that had someone ever simply walked up to a person on the street and asked for directions or pulled over to the curb and asked for directions from a passerby, the most likely route to get from the McReynolds home to the Ramsey home would be to drive South on Broadway Towards some street whose name I now fail to remember but recall began with the letter "C". This obviously would give us yet another example of "SBTC" and also give us yet another example of a tenuous relationship to the McReynolds.

My initial reason for the original post was to show how easy it is to come up with something that sounds very plausible and does have some tenuous relationships but is simply the result of our desperate search for meaning in this case.

".........Note: To get from the McReynolds former residence in Boulder to the Ramsey home you would be advised to go South on Broadway Towards Cashman. SBTC? Nah! Coincidence! ......"

South on Broadway Towards Cashman.

And, "Victory!", I found it! ??

No.
>Is it preferable to the driving directions from the McReynolds
>former residence in Boulder to the Ramsey home? Yes.
>Those directions would be SBTC but the word 'victory' seems unrelated.

I admit the SBTC on its own is less potent than the linkage of SBTC and the word 'victory'. Conqueror and Victory provide a certain thematic consistency that makes it appealing.

"Sometimes, so blurred by my own eyes, I've seen the best things come and go simultaneously; Though deep in the future, maybe I shall be the conquerer (sic) and live in multiple peace."

Frankly, I have difficulty seeing how this ("...shall be the conqueror...") fits the S.B.T.C. signature. There really is no "Victory" nor is there a "Conqueror" in the murder of a six year old girl, other than the sexual experience. JMK never said anything about the ransom note. He never said anything about the others holding JonBenet, nor about the victory nor the SBTC signature of the note, nor of the foreign faction. He cared only about the sexual experience, and the "accidental" death of the subject of his obsession.

She Beat The Cancer, Victory (mocking them) or, Someone Beneath The City (hence the movie Ransom)Saved Boulder This Christmas. Or maybe even, Santa Banned The Club. Lots of things would fit with Victory, imo

Santa said he was part of the club after he got the scarf, which he didn't seem to pleased about.

I think Santa thought the Ramseys were cheap. His remark on the Rivera Live Show, "and this from a very wealthy family"...referring to the $2 bottle of glitter, in addition (in my mind) that for them to pay him a mere $25-30 for his performances as their Santa, really set off his disgust at their values. He made such a big issue about the $2 bottle of sparkle...it was just unbelieveable!

He probably thought the scarf was cheap, too.

Assuming this phrase has something to do with some on-going esoteric philosophy of Karr's, how does that relate to what preceeds it in the RN as Mikie asks? In other words, how does it relate to a pre-accidental killing kidnapping fantasy (also assuming Karr wrote it) or a post accidental killing coverup?

This shall be the mother of all explanations.

I still see so little evidence of this and a great deal that indicates the contrary.
Particularly the time taken to conceal the body rather than flee in fear of the screams having already alerted someone.

First, consider the stun gun: It was apparently applied twice. I have no way to imagine a stun gun being used in the basement in any sort of scenario other than which the killer does this for his pleasure. Part of the pleasure is the whimpering and screaming that accompanies the return of musculature control.

South on Broadway Towards Cashman."

Don, I think that should be "South on Broadway Towards Cascade".

Isn't Cascade also the street on which John Ramsey saw the small white hatchback vehicle resembling the white Honda Civic owned by the McReynolds during the early morning hours of December 26th?