Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 5
» Latest member: jameson
» Forum threads: 1,430
» Forum posts: 4,318

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 10 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 10 Guest(s)

Latest Threads
She shouldn't need fundin...
Forum: Truth about Tricia Griffith and weBsleuths
Last Post: Dave
10 hours ago
» Replies: 7
» Views: 3,756
their last photo question...
Forum: Miguel Sancho and David Tomasini
Last Post: jameson245
Yesterday, 01:21 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 16
gossip
Forum: Miguel Sancho and David Tomasini
Last Post: jameson245
Yesterday, 12:58 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 10
Steve Thomas
Forum: THEORIES
Last Post: Dave
06-02-2019, 11:55 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 393
The basement elevator
Forum: Rooms
Last Post: jameson245
05-19-2019, 03:43 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 141
Beware of this team - JMO
Forum: Miguel Sancho and David Tomasini
Last Post: ujepiyo
05-10-2019, 12:25 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 467
Sancho program comment
Forum: jameson's back
Last Post: jameson245
04-25-2019, 02:53 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 136
sold to
Forum: The House at 755 15th Street, Boulder, CO
Last Post: jameson245
04-23-2019, 03:48 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 129
715 15th St.
Forum: Boulder crimes
Last Post: jameson245
04-22-2019, 03:56 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 103
in the news
Forum: The House at 755 15th Street, Boulder, CO
Last Post: jameson245
04-22-2019, 12:12 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 86

 
  adult male approaching young children
Posted by: jameson245 - 05-08-2017, 01:06 PM - Forum: Boulder crimes - No Replies

Ad content was partly D.A.'s work
Letter to the Editor
Tuesday, May 13, 1997
The Daily Camera accidentally omitted a line from a Guest Opinion that was published on Sunday, May 11 by Stephanie Hult: "Beginning in fall, 1997 a strand will be implemented in Lafayette Elementary School ... " I have learned that a misunderstanding has occurred with respect to an advertisement placed in Sunday's Boulder Daily Camera offering a reward for information leading to an arrest in the JonBenet Ramsey case. The advertisement, which referred to the possibility of " ... an adult male approaching young children in Boulder in late 1996," was placed by the Ramsey family based on information developed in my office. I was not informed until this weekend that this information was to go into the Ramsey advertisement.
As I have said all along, it is my intention to approach this case with an open mind, which means all leads are being carefully pursued, as they must be in any investigation. We believed the suggestion that Boulder families be asked to recall whether they had seen anything unusual at the time of the murder was reasonable, so one of my lawyers authorized the Ramseys' attorneys to use this language in their advertisement.
The response Friday to several reporters who asked for reaction from the District Attorney was that we would have no comment. We see now that this understandably caused some in the news media and the public to believe that this ad was the work solely of the Ramsey family, when in fact, it was partly the product of our commitment to follow all reasonable leads.
I urge any citizen with information about this investigation to contact the Boulder Police Department at 440-7867.
ALEX HUNTER
District Attorney
Boulder

Print this item

  Questions for BORG
Posted by: Summer Dawn - 05-05-2017, 09:26 AM - Forum: Questions FOR Borg - No Replies

Im failing to understand something.

Since day one, the Ramsey family have been under EXTREME scurtiny.

Every single thing they did.. they were judged for.

A big thing was about their "behavior" after the Ransom note was found.

Which one of you (BORG) have lost a child to murder? Which one of you have lost a child to murder IN YOUR OWN HOME WITH A RANSOM NOTE INCLUDED??

Hello? Nobody?? Thats what I thought.

Its common sense (something these morons dont have) that people react differently to situations.

Patsy was VERY outgoing. EVERYONE says that. John was more reserved. Obviously! So OBVIOUSLY THEY WILL REACT DIFFERENT TO THE SITUATION!!!!!!! COMMON SENSE!!!!! 

Linda Arndt has NO ROOM TO TALK ABOUT ANYTHING. She botched the investigation HORRIBLY. She ignored common police protocol for a crime scene. She is irrelevant.

Why would the Ramsey family have SO many plans for their future if they were planning on killing their child?

Dont bother saying"It was an accident".

NO NO AND NO. 

JonBenet was NOT bed wetting because of "Sexual abuse" She wet the bed because she saw her mother FIGHT FOR HER LIFE. Patsy beat all the odds and survived cancer for the first time.  THAT IS A FACT.

Print this item

  LE, stop being BORG
Posted by: jameson245 - 04-30-2017, 04:56 PM - Forum: How to solve this mystery - Replies (2)

Found this on another forum and it really shows how.... WRONG the present "investigation" - or non-investigation is.  This is from Blink on Crime

"perhaps you could delete this next part because it’s too close to home for me…but my neighbor is a Boulder native and worked for BPD at the time Jonbenet was killed… she days she’s bff with Jane Harmer and she saw her last week…Jane told her that nothing new has developed as a result of the 20th anniversary specials …nothing BPD will act on anyway…but when i asked her about the DNA being in CODIS she said it isnt…the killer is Patsy and she’s dead so they don’t need to look for an intruder…that JBs body wasn’t bruised and savaged… she said Garnett who also grew up in Boulder agrees…who knows? I realize this can be construed as gossip but for the most part my neighbor believes the Ramseys murdered the BPD along with their daughter…it’s just so painful for the Boulder police everytime it hits the news…they have burried it…"

Print this item

  Interesting article with details
Posted by: jameson245 - 04-26-2017, 04:57 PM - Forum: What is in the news - staying up to date - Replies (4)

The Murder of JonBenét Ramsey: Why We're Still Obsessed With This Case More Than 20 Years After Her Death
by Natalie Finn | Wed, Apr 26, 2017 1:20 PM




[Image: rs_1024x811-160914131041-1024.JonBenet-R...091416.jpg]Splash News
[Image: rs_285x143-170417100025-285-true-crime-week.jpg]
"The list of suspects narrows. Soon there will be no one on the list but you." –Alex Hunter, Boulder District Attorney, Feb. 13, 1997
JonBenét Ramsey would have turned 27 years old this year. But as we all know, she never even made it to 7.
Instead, the youngest child of John and Patsy Ramsey was found dead in the basement of their Boulder, Colo., home on the afternoon of Dec. 26, 1996—almost eight hours after Patsy frantically called 911 to report that her 6-year-old daughter had been kidnapped.
She had woken at around 5:30 a.m. to find a two-and-a-half-page, sloppily printed ransom note at the bottom of the stairs that threatened to "behead" the child if her parents didn't fork over $118,000 in ransom to some "foreign faction."
It was John who discovered JonBenét's body shortly after 1:30 p.m. on his second search of the house, which by then was already full of police and family friends. He carried the child, who was still dressed in the pajamas she wore to bed the night before, up the stairs and laid her down near the Christmas tree in the living room.
JonBenét appeared to have been garroted and her skull was fractured from a blow to the head. The medical examiner would later discover vaginal injuries that suggested some kind of sexual contact had occurred, and there were spots that appeared to be blood on her underwear though blood smears found on her body weren't in places that would correspond with the stains.

[Image: rs_300x300-160226081301-600.Jon-Benet-Ra...022616.jpg]
Read
The Case Of: JonBenét Ramsey: Get to Know the Major Players

[Image: rs_1024x696-160913180945-1024.JonBenet-R...091316.jpg]Karl Gehring/Liaison
What was tragic and horrifying in any respect within moments turned into a crime of baffling circumstances: Why the ransom note when JonBenét wasn't even taken from her house? Or was she? Did someone tamper with that basement window or not? Why weren't there any footprints in the snow outside the house if an intruder was responsible? How did no one find her during the first search of the house, which included a family friend glancing into the wine cellar she was eventually found in but not turning on the light? How would a proper forensic investigation even be possible with so many people in and out of the Ramseys' house on that first day, even before John had moved his daughter's body, seemingly contaminating who-knows-how-much evidence?
Fast-forward to now, with the 20th anniversary of JonBenét's death recently past and yet another onscreen treatment of the case on the horizon, and most of those questions remain unanswered.

[Image: rs_600x600-160914131040-600.JonBenet-Ram...091416.jpg]
Read
3 Bombshells from The Case Of: JonBenét Ramsey
[Image: rs_634x1024-160901055329-634.JonBenet-Ra...090116.jpg]ZUMA Archive/ZUMAPRESS.com
Because JonBenét Ramsey's murder remains unsolved. No one was ever charged in connection with her death. One man confessed and was arrested, but his confession was bogus. Other names have been floated about through the years, but nothing conclusive.
John and Patsy Ramsey remained suspects—if not always actively under investigation, than certainly in the public's opinion—for over a decade. Patsy died of ovarian cancer on June 24, 2006, and was buried next to JonBenét, still under a shroud of suspicion. In December 2003, DNA from the scene was submitted to the FBI database. Boulder County District Attorney Mary Lacy informed John in 2008, in a letter made public, that new DNA testing, thanks to "touch DNA" technology, had convinced her that neither he, Patsy nor Burke was involved in the killing. Rather, test results pointed to an "unknown male."
"To the extent that we may have contributed in any way to the public perception that you might have been involved in this crime, I am deeply sorry," Lacy wrote.
But eight years later, a joint investigation by Boulder's Daily Camera and 9 News questioned the validity of Lacy's decision to officially clear the Ramseys because of that DNA evidence. The outlets reported in October that there were three distinct genetic markers—Lacy knew of two, this was the first public mention of the third—found on the child's pajamas, and that the one sample that had been used to clear suspects could actually have been a composite from multiple people's DNA.
"It's a rather obvious point, but I mean, if you're looking for someone that doesn't exist, because actually it's several people, it's a problem," Troy Eid, a former state's attorney for Colorado who helped review the case for the governor in 1999, told the paper in October.
In an interview with ABC News, Lacy addressed the new findings and the lingering criticism. "I've withstood worse than this...and it's nothing compared to what the Ramsey family has gone through targeted as suspects in their own daughter's murder," she said. "I was trying to prevent a horrible travesty of justice," she continued. "I was scared to death that despite the fact that there was no evidence, no psychopathy and no motive, the case was a train going down the track and the Ramseys were tied to that track."
She maintains that investigators should have done more at the time.

So even in 2017, it doesn't feel right to call this a cold case, because the fascination, the morbid curiosity, the quest for answers—the downright obsession with the murder of JonBenét Ramsey—feels as current as ever. Of course the media and TV in general gave the case the full anniversary treatment, with two new TV documentaries having aired last September, followed by Lifetime's Who Killed JonBenét?, 16 years after the miniseries Perfect Murder, Perfect Town: JonBenét and the City of Boulder premiered on CBS. Lawrence Schiller's adaptation of his own book about the investigation starred Marg Helgenberger as Patsy and Dyanne Iandoli as JonBenét.

[Image: rs_300x300-160830100140-600.burke-ramsey.83016.jpg]

Print this item

  Roscoe Clark
Posted by: jameson245 - 04-25-2017, 10:53 AM - Forum: Absolutely insane posts - mostly by BORG - Replies (10)

OK, after reading this guys garbage for a year, I have to make a comment.  YES, he has contact with John Ramsey.  YES, he wants John to give him evidence (which John doesn't possess) in order for his nifty-difty new DNA machine to process promising it will come up with an actual IMAGE of the killer.  Yes, John is cordial to him - - John is cordial to everyone (as evidenced on the Larry King Live show when he sat across the table from Steve Thomas and didn't go for his throat.

So he has a page and an audience and some think he is so smart.  Well, I think he is a total fraud.

I asked him to let me submit a blind sample to him - - I would of course know the identity of the source of good DNA and would share that with 5 other people before he did his testing - - let's see how close his image is.  He didn't even respond to the challenge.  I think he hasn't got a real lab and can't do what he says.  He's a man with some sharp ideas, maybe a shop at his house - - but a scientist this man is NOT!

OK, having said that, here is part of his insane theory.  (I promise the evidence does not fit his story.)

He wrote,

"Jonbenet Investigation added 6 new photos.
· April 20 at 5:21pm ·
The intruder that turn into a killer after the 911 call for help got him self lock inside a remodeled elevator shaft after the police search the basement. He had to pry him self out of this space. A broken Red knife was located in the basement.
Profile
After the police tried to open the wine cellar door that had the killer and JonBenet inside this room, the killer left this room soon after the police search the basement and went back upstairs.
Soon as posible the killer exited the wine cellar and as the killer was looking at the basement windows as a possible exit point, a neighbor came walking down the basement steps calling out JonBenet's name.
The killer had to quickly find a hidding place and entered the remodeled elevator shaft space in the train room.
The self closing and self locking door closed and lock him inside this room. There was no inside way to open the door, this was a safty door for the elevator shaft.
When the basement was cleared of people, the killer found himself lock inside this steel door and frame room. He had to pry himself self out with a red knife. He left fresh damage to the painted surfaces. This was reported to the police by John Ramsey that morning.
By this time the police move the people in the house to the Den and the sun room. The basement steps could not be seen from these two locations, the killer simply walk up the basement steps, turn right and exited out the left open and unlock butler kitchen door.
A neighbor seen a tall, brown hair, white male run very fast from the side yard, this was after the police was there at the home for some time.
The killer was still in the house when the police search the basement.
Case fact.
Frost and snow covered the Ramsey's property the early morning at 6 am.
The police with their flashlights search the yard for any signs for foot prints in the snow and frost. There was no track. Case facts.
Why?
Because the killer was still in the basement just like JonBenet was in the wine cellar.
Now you know more about this case.
Team JBI"


My comment - his case facts are fiction.  Don't buy it.

Print this item

  For Sherry Burgett Hilliard
Posted by: jameson245 - 04-16-2017, 06:33 PM - Forum: Answering BORG questions - No Replies

Thanks for submitting the question.  I will be happy to respond.

Your question:   What has SHE done for this case other than benefit financially?

My Answer: Well, let's see what I have done.

1997, not long after the murder, I joined a forum and tried to be a voice of calm and reason.  I asked people to wait for the evidence to be shared before anyone go crazy and lynch the parents.  I tried to find evidence of prior abuse and neglect, history of alcohol or drug use, some motive like insurance payout or custody dispute.  I found nothing.

I posted that JonBenet's name was not in the ransom note and that caught the attention of the police since very few knew that fact to be true.

I got the attention of LE and on the list of things TO DO, locating me was on  the list given to Lou Smit the day he was hired. 

I later told LE that a third weapon was involved - other than the garotte and what was used to hit her in the head.   That turned out to be the stun gun.

I was privately lured into a discussion with a college professor and later found out he had - - as an "EXPERT", decided I was the killer - he let the cops know and he advised NEWSWEEK Magazine to hold the front page for the reveal.  The headline was to be "Paging JonBenét's killer."

I said nothing to anyone about that episode - - - quickly cleared my name.  By then I was leading one of the biggest Ramsey forums going.  I think it was important to have that discussion alive and telling the truth.  Not allowing the garbage I see posted unchallenged on facebook, topix and other sites.

Moving on.  I hosted a very GOOD group, we found a lot of TRUTH and shared with all.

When I got to meet the Ramseys, go into the murder house - - I shared that with ALL.  Acandyrose still has some of my photos taken inside the house on her site.

I acted as a go-between for people who wanted to get information to the investigators.  Some could do it on their own but others found closed doors.  When I felt a suspect really was a GOOD suspect, I could make a phone call and talk to someone immediately.  Sometimes that was LE like Lou Smit, sometimes LE outside Boulder.  And when I felt it was the right thing to do, it was media.  I made a lot of contacts.  Some may have disliked me but most had to admit they respected me because I wasn't telling lies - my information was GOOD.

So when Steve Thomas had his key witness going into the grand jury and I found out it was that college professor - - - I stepped up and went to Boulder to let the DA know the witness was a charlatan, a fraud.  The DA wouldn't leave his office to speak with me and I wouldn't leave the file without seeing him - - - so I went on 48 Hours and - - - according to several books  - Foster was toast.  I am very proud that I stopped that false witness from taking a mother from her child.

So I had a forum and I fought to publish the facts.  I am the one who made deposition transcripts available for everyone.  I got hold of the FAX between Miller and Hoffman and published that.      I published crime scene photos that no one else had.  I got a book removed from the printing presses and saw it replaced with transcripts of the Ramsey interviews.  (Some errors in there but a far better book than was planned.)

I spent HOURS transcribing TV shows so we would have transcripts to discuss on the forums.

I have traveled to several states to review evidence the BORG swore would have me jumping the fence.  They were always wrong.

I have traveled to a few states and met with people here or worked with them online to develop detailed files on suspects.  No, no one was aware of that as - - - only one person killed JonBenet and I don't put names out there at all.  If a name was not in the media or brought out by someone else, I protected the names.   But my efforts have seen probably a half dozen good and reasonable suspects forever CLEARED - - sometimes by DNA.

I have worked as a consultant to many reporters, a few documentary makers.  I have "edited" a few books.  I have kept many confidences - - I am good at keeping confidences.

I have put up my own money for a small reward and to pay for an ad in the Boulder papers to remind people this is not over.

I started a GoFundMe campaign to remind people that this is not over - - - and I know the money can and will help clear more suspects.  I can only hope it will also identify the killer.

I keep reading, making calls, seeking the truth, asking questions and building files that one day make be the seed needed to make a call to LE or media.  I keep trying.  My work is far from over.  And that is why I reactivated WebbSleuths.org.

Can I ask what YOU do to help see this case solved?  I know you flame me a lot, in an area where I don't post.  You don't know much of anything and choose to believe the negative stuff you find on BORG forums - kind of a stupid thing to do - and I really don't care.  But you asked a real question so I decided to answer.


Hope you have a great Easter - Mine was wonderful, surrounded by family and food and good conversation.  I will be talking with Ramsey people-who-matter next week and...... I hope I answered your question and you can go back to flaming knowing - - - I really don't care.  Your lack of information and understanding shows who YOU are.  My past contributions to the case stand witness to who I am.

As for the "evidence" against me online - - are you so naïve you believe that crap?  Really?  You don't know people can and do edit chat logs and reprint them as real?  You don't know people misquote others and simply make stuff up?

According to one BORG myth, I nearly committed suicide once at a big fancy dinner party - jealous because one of the people at the dinner had a girlfriend?     The next morning I went on camera looking (according to some) pretty good in the 48 Hours show.  The poster who reported my bloody attack on myself (I don't remember if I was at the table or on it)  went to Boulder later, according to her posts,  to sleep with all the Ramsey people I had - - I laughed, her trip was going to be boring because I don't cheat on my husband.  Well, I hear she went out there and cheated on HER husband - - but that's her story to tell.

Hope you have a good Easter - mine was great, as usual.  Life is good, my efforts in Ramsey are earnest and I am pleased with seeing the suspect growing shorter. The BORG is like some sewer spill a few towns away, not my problem.

But I got sent your question and thought -- - why not?  So here's your answer.  And I wonder if you are really as proud of your efforts in Ramsey as I am in mine.

Print this item

  Ollie Gray - RIP
Posted by: jameson245 - 04-06-2017, 07:54 PM - Forum: What is in the news - staying up to date - Replies (6)

       

My dear friend, Ollie Gray, has moved onto his next great adventure.

My heart is heavy and I am at a loss for words.

He will be greatly missed and I can only say I was enriched by knowing him.  He was a truly good and gentle man.

Print this item

  Police chief speaks out on JonBenet Ramsey case, regrets it
Posted by: Summer Dawn - 04-06-2017, 07:45 PM - Forum: What is in the news - staying up to date - Replies (1)

By STEPHANIE SLIFER CBS NEWS February 25, 2015, 2:37 PM
Police chief speaks out on JonBenet Ramsey case, regrets it


BOULDER, Colo - Former Boulder, Colorado police Chief Mark Beckner participated in an "Ask Me Anything" session on the social-networking/news site Reddit where he spoke about the JonBenet Ramsey case, but now the former law enforcement head says he regrets it and that he didn't realize his comments would filter out to the rest of the world.
"I talked to the organizer and my impression was that this was a members-only type group that talked about unsolved mysteries all around the world," Becker said in an interview published Tuesday in the Boulder Daily Camera. The Q&A took place Saturday.


"I didn't know it was an open-architecture type thing, or I wouldn't have done it," he added. "It was a misunderstanding and naivete on my part."


The 59-year-old Beckner, who retired in April 2014 and who has mostly remained tight-lipped when it comes to discussing the investigation into the murder of 6-year-old JonBenet Ramsey, spoke relatively freely during his online Q&A and said and he believes no one will ever be convicted in the pageant girl's long-unsolved 1996 murder.
Beckner also commented on authorities' handling of the case, saying, "I wish we would have done a much better job of securing and controlling the crime scene on day one. We also should have separated John and Patsy [JonBenet's parents] and gotten full statements from them that day. Letting them go was a big mistake, as they soon lawyered up and we did not get to formally interview them again until May of 1997, five months after their daughter was murdered."
He said the police department was short staffed on the day of the murder due to the Christmas holiday and said there was confusion at the scene because of lack of law enforcement personnel. He also acknowledged the Ramseys' "position" in the community could have influenced the initial handling the case.


Beckner also criticized the Boulder District Attorney's office, then led by Alex Hunter, for getting too involved in the case.
Six-year-old JonBenet was found bludgeoned and strangled December 26, 1996 in the basement of her Boulder, Colo. home several hours after her mother, Patsy Ramsey, called 911 to say her daughter was missing and that a ransom note had been left behind.


No charges have ever been filed in the case, despite a grand jury having voted in 1999 to charge the child's parents in connection with her death. At the time, D.A. Hunter declined to sign the indictment, saying there was insufficient evidence to prove the charges at trial. The grand jury's decision was not made public until 2013.


Both Patsy and John Ramsey have always maintained their innocence. Patsy Ramsey died in 2006 of cancer. In 2008, former Boulder County District Attorney Mary Lacy said that DNA evidence suggests the killer was a stranger, not a family member, and publicly exonerated the Ramseys.


During the Reddit Q&A, former police Chief Beckner said the Colorado Bureau of Investigation opined the DNA found on JonBenet's clothing was likely sweat or saliva, but that it's difficult to say for sure since it was such a small amount.
On whether there might have been an intruder on the night of the murder, Beckner said, "Most investigators do not believe there was a legitimate point of entry. It is unknown how an intruder may have gotten in."


When asked Tuesday whether he regretted anything he said on Reddit, Beckner told the Daily Camera that he tried to be honest and fair.


"I think the only thing I would emphasize is that the unknown DNA [from JonBenet's clothing] is very important. And I'm not involved any more, but that has got to be the focus of the investigation. In my opinion, at this point, that's your suspect."


Beckner, however, noted on Reddit that the case is "not actively being worked on."
But Kim Kobel, a spokesperson for the The Boulder Police Department, told 48 Hours' Crimesider on Wednesday that while the investigation is not active, it is still an open homicide investigation.
"We still do receive leads and we look into every single lead we receive," she said.
Kobel added that the Boulder Police Department was not aware ahead of time that the Reddit Q&A was going to take place and said they instead found out online via other news articles.
Current Boulder Police Chief Greg Testa told Crimesider Beckner has reached

 out to the department since the Reddit Q&A. Testa said he understands why Beckner participated in the online chat, saying it came to him through his current position as an online teacher at Norwich University in Vermont.
"Mark [Beckner] wouldn't have done anything to compromise the investigation," Testa said.

Print this item

  For James Guill
Posted by: jameson245 - 04-04-2017, 03:54 PM - Forum: Answering BORG questions - Replies (3)

[/url]who says there is no intruder evidence.

I have to ask what you have been reading and watching - - sure not the depositions or police reports, the crime scene photos or any number of GOOD sources of information.  I fear you have entered into the BORG Twilight Zone ane need to find your way back to the light and some truth.



[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill No intruder evidence. Every time I ask for this alleged intruder evidence, I am given things that have been thoroughly debunked. You guys always try to twist it to fit your intruder theory. It's not there. Grand Jury indicted after looking at all of the evidence for over a year!
James Guill I've made my case repeatedly, Kathy. The basement window, shoe prints, finger/palm prints, hairs, DNA, stun gun etc.. The police report also says all doors were locked and no signs of entry at any window. If there was an intruder, he had a key. And Patsy wrote that ransom note. No doubt about it.

Starting at the beginning - - if you take one piece of evidence at a time and research it here - on webbsleuths.org - you may find you can find more intruder evidence than you can handle.

From the stun gun - the marks, the interviews with Mike Doberson - the experiments he has done - the other cases he worked on - - - to the list of "things to do" that came out of the Police meetings - - one being find out who OWNED these stun guns back then.  To the interview with the manufacturer.  That stun gun is no theory - - but as you made clear in that other discussion, you really don't care.


[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill There is no proof that anyone else was in the house that night! Where's your proof?? To say that someone COULD'VE been, is not proof that there was someone!
l All that exists is a mountain of circumstantial inculpatory evidence implicating the family! No evidence of anyone else having been there! You have nothing.


[url=https://www.facebook.com/melinda.soppel?fref=ufi]Melinda Soppel then invited James Guill to read a thread on Evidence of Intruder


jameson askd - Care to guess his response?    Wait no longer.

[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill No thanks.



jameson - "THIS is the BORG mentality.  Don't try to confuse their set minds with facts.  They like being BORG and, damn it, they will NOT be unassimilated!"

Print this item

  and some newer ones
Posted by: jameson245 - 04-04-2017, 11:54 AM - Forum: Questions FOR Borg - Replies (1)

Jinks Obs wrote - "If my theory serves me right..then     There's dna of Hispanic. African-American native American and caucasian. The cover up of this crime is beyond heinous    Sorry to tell you this idis but the ramseys are definitely involved. They could have told the truth but decided not too. So apparently they want to be up shits creek without a paddle."


So, everyone has the right to have a theory - and I clearly think Jimks is off. 

I have not seen any report that indicates there is DNA from African American or Native American - - but I clearly don't have every bit of evidence out there - - so my question to Jinks is this - - -

Can you tell us the source of this information and make a real case against any member of the family?  I ask because I see a HUGE list of exculpatory evidence and think you are making this stuff up as you go along.

Print this item