I had written an email to Belinda Schultz and she called me yesterday. Her husband, Paul E Schultz, is a convicted incarcerated pedophile associated with Heuy Meaux (famous New Orleans Record Producer who was arrested for sadistic child pornography and pedophelia). Paul Schultz was basically pimping out his son Nick Schultz in a pedophile ring and satanic cult and he was convicted for part of that but the satanic aspect was not mentioned for fear a judge and jury would not believe it and acquit him. He will be released in two years. 
Alex Constantine is the one who wrote about The Belinda Schultz Files on the internet and said that Belinda's husband Paul Schultz was connected a pedophile ring and satanic cult associated with was also associated with the Ramsey murder. 
http://jwarchive.tripod.com/052t72000JW-CaseConnectionsToPorn5292.txt
Much of what Alex wrote is NOT true. Belinda didn't personally find any connection to her husband's case and the Ramsey murder as Alex Constantine writes. However Alex did have some findings that were not sourced that he may have found out from other investigative people, not Belinda Schultz.
Belinda did tell me something interesting that COULD be a connection that did NOT involve Alex Constantine. Nick Schultz's detective in Sugarland is named Bill Colson He is retired and lives in Navasota, TX . He told her that he got a formal request from LE out in Colorado Springs about someone involved with the Nick Schultz case that was also involved in the Ramsey case. She said this person was a friend of the Ramsey family and had an odd name. I asked if it was Fleet White. She said "yes, yes, that's it". They wouldn't tell her much more than that other than he was required to release the information despite her pleas not to get involved. She said that Detective Bill Colson said Fleet White was involved in the satanic cult. 
She appeared to be very sweet, articulate, and sane. She is confident her son was used in cult activities by her husband. She told me she never even drank back then, let alone got involved in drugs, guns, and child pornography like her husband. She simply did not know the man she married. She felt he married her as a "front'.
Much of what Nick told her at a very young age was hard for her to believe but some of it does match some of what Nancy Krebs had to say. He told her that they killed one of his pets and took the heart out and said they would do that to his mother if he ever told any one about the abuse.  He talked about underground tunnels with men in uniforms with shiny buttons waving their arm in a hail Hitler motion, the Third Reich, child sacrifices, and animal sacrifices. Belinda did not know if this was a very wild imagination or the truth. 
When they took Nick to the first doctor to get evidence of this abuse the doctor came back and said he could not find evidence of it. The doctor's nurse later called Belinda discretely and said there absolutely WAS evidence of horrific abuse. This nurse later mysteriously disappeared, said to have gone to another country. They took Nick to another doctor who said there WAS abuse and he was found dead three weeks before he was about to testify. Nick's own therapist was afraid of testifying about ritual satanic abuse and said that courts shun therapists who talk about it so they didn't even go for that aspect at trial. However she definitely believed that Nick was used in ritual abuse in a satanic cult. She had seen it before. 
Belinda said that she had contacted the Cult Awareness Network and found out that a person on the board of directors was the same person who befriended her during this prosecution stage. Nick's therapist told her that she thought this person was planted with her to keep an eye on her actions. I asked Belinda if she knew who owned the Cult Awareness Network. She didn't. I told her that it is owned by the Church of Scientology---so when you call to report a cult you are calling a cult. She was surprised to hear that. The Church of Scientology also is said to have a connection to Temple of Set/ Church of Satan along with L Ron Hubbard, founder of Church of Scientology. Nick Schultz had identified Michael Aquino (founder Temple of Set) and his wife Lillith at some point in investigation interviews or therapy so there is believed to a connection to this particular cult. Belinda Schultz can be reached at 832-REDACTED. I think it would be good to follow up with Bill Colson. 

In May of 2001, the Rocky Mountain News published a story that they have since removed from the Internet - a great loss to those students of the case who are seeking the truth.   I have a copy of that story and will share it in sections on this thread.

Lou made his case for the papers and while neither the police nor DA would make comments, the article also offered the responses BORG had made earlier.  In this thread I may add more recent observations and I will let you know those are MY comments.

Moving on....

These were found in Paula Woodward's book.

District Attorney Mary Lacy:  "There will be those who will choose to continue to differ with our conclusion.  But DNA is very often the most reliable forensic evidence we can hope to find, and we rely on it often to bring to justice those who have committed crimes."


And from Police Chief Mark Beckner I have three quotes to share.  After llearning of the 2008 testing on the DNA, he said that was a "significant finding".  The he went on.
"The police department has continued to look diligently for the source of the foreign DNA, and to date we have compared DNA samples taken from more than 200 people."
"Finding the source of the DNA is key to helping us determine who killed JonBenét."

And in 2015, the Daily Camera shared this quote:  "I think the only thing I would emphasize is that the unknown DNA is very important. And I'm not involved anymore, but that has got to be the focus of the investigation.  In my opinion, at this moment, that's your suspect."

I have a huge file now on DNA and want to let you know how some of the earliest tests came back.

The first DNA samples included the Ramsey family (John, Patsy, John Andrew, Melinda, Burke and Uncle Jeff) as well as Priscilla White, John Fernie, Linda Hoffmann and Mervin Pugh.  I have two forms on those samples - - a paper where it lists what was submitted to the lab and then a second paper, the report that said all those people were NOT the source of the DNA found mixed with the blood in JonBenet's panties. 

The police knew there was unidentified DNA left there just days after the murder but continued to push the parents as the #1 suspects.  Shameful, if you ask me.

But, as BORG would point out, there was (in the report) a note that these people could only be cleared if the DNA found was from a single source - - which we now know it was.  (Later advancements brought about more detailed results in the lab and now we have a profile for that DNA which could positively identify the source of the male DNA found mixed with the victim's blood in her panties.)

OK, so today I felt a need to share this paper with you - the result of tests done on samples submitted to the lab on 1/15/1997.  I do not know for sure the dates the samples were taken but this is when they were submitted to the lab.  These blood samples from possible suspects were compared to what we now know as GSLDPD99178617.

Roscoe is a poster on Facebook who has taken a lot of online courses and claims to be big CSI with a lab.   I do know he HAS spoken to John Ramsey, that he supports the intruder theory, but I think he is full of himself and hurts the search for justice more than he helps.

How?  By publishing misinformation like it is fact.

I am going to comment on a few of his recent statements - - 

Roscoe in plain print, me in CAPS

Roscoe: JonBenet's body was not hidden in the wine cellar.

PLACED BEHIND A CLOSED DOOR - "HIDDEN"?  SEMANTICS IN PLAY HERE.

Or was this room ever used as a wine cellar by the Ramsey's . It was a cold and damp storage room. No place that a mother would want her child in.

THAT ROOM WAS RIGHT NEXT TO THE BOILER AND WAS VERY, VERY WARM.  HUMID, MOLD  GROWING ON THE FLOOR.  NOT COLD AT ALL.


Right at sun set, a neighbor seen a tall, brown hair, slim white male walk up the the North side yard walking with a purpose. The open and unlock butler door side of the yard.

JOE BARNHILL SAID HE SAW SOMEONE CROSS THE YARD, NOT SURE WHO IT WAS, MAY HAVE BEEN JAR.  NOTHING SAID ABOUT THAT PERSON GOING IN THROUGH THE BUTLER'S DOOR. THE DOOR WAS FOUND OPEN THE NEXT MORNING BUT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE IT WAS UNLOCKED OR OPENED THE NIGHT BEFORE.


The Ranson note would be the voice of the killer because he would be in the house with JonBenet to complete this crime. The instruction note must be long anought to get the point across not to call the police because he would be found in the house and the crime would be over. A Longer note would be required than if the crime was perform from out side the house.

PLEASE, ROSCOE, USE SPELL CHECK AND CHECK YOUR GRAMMAR IF YOU WANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY!
THREE PAGES WERE NOT NECESSARY TO SAY "DON'T CALL POLICE".

AND THEN IT GETS DEEP.

The water meter starting metering the water usage and this was a sound signal that the family was up.

PURE THEORY WITH NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING IT. THE SOUNDS LUTHER STANTON HEARD WOULD INDICATE THE KILLER LEFT SHORTLY AFTER A SCREAM WAS HEARD.  JONBENET WAS IN FULL RIGOR MORTIS WHEN FOUND, SHE DIED HOURS BEFORE ROSCOE WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE.

He movers JonBenet to the top of the washer and haft of the dryer tops,

NO EVIDENCE OF THAT, JUST HIS IMAGINATION

this was a place to monitor any phone calls from up stairs. There was a basement phone at this location.

TRUE, THERE WAS A PHONE THERE BUT WHY WOULD ANYONE RISK BEING FOUND IN THE HOUSE WITH A MURDER VICTIM WHEN HE HAD HOURS TO LEAVE?  

A 5 inch piece of used matching black tape from his black colored stun gun was place over the hand set leaving a circle impression in the tape.

HUH??

If the 911 operator heard any voices after Patsy hung up the upstairs phone, this would have came from the basement phone, and the voices would sound muffled.

WHY WOULD THE BASEMENT PHONE NOT SEND CLEAR SIGNALS?  AND REMEMBER, WE ALL HEARD THE TAPE, THERE'S NO VOICE/CONVERSATION THERE.

The 911 call for help was place. Printed many time in the ransom note SHE dies if they call for help.
The killer must do as he printed, she dies and the ransom portions of this crime is now over.
He pulls the double loop to JonBenet's head down towards the ground, her head hangs over the dryer top and so does the gold chain around her neck. Both the cord and her chain hangs down as it entwined together supporting this as fact. The washer and dryer tops was the only table like surface big anought that he could place the wrapper up JonBenet inside two white blankets and still mointor the family. Putting her on the ground would be much harder.

SHE WAS DEAD LONG BEFORE THE 911 CALL WAS MADE.
THE ANGLE OF THE CORD AND THE BRUISING ON HER SHOULDER PLACES HER ON THE FLOOR. THE URINE STAINS INDICATE SHE WAS IN THE HALL OUTSIDE THE DOOR TO THE WINDOWLESS ROOM.  WHY ANY SEEKER OF JUSTICE WOULD WANT TO MISREPRESENT THE EVIDENCE IS BEYOND ME AND ONE REASON I THINK ROSCOE DOES MORE HARM THAN GOOD IN THIS DISCUSSION.

He now needs to move JonBenet to a place that he can become out of view. He remove the tape from the phone hand set and places the 5 inch tape over JonBenet's lips, this action was to cover over the body fluids coming from her mouth and from getting on himself as he rows her toward himself and carrier's her to the wine cellar. He was not hidding her, she was place in the center of the large 10 ft X 12 ft room.

WHY DOES HE HAVE TO MOVE THE BODY AT ALL?  HE WOULD HAVE NO REASON TO THINK SHE WOULD REMAIN UNSEEN BEHIND A CLOSED DOOR IF ANY SEARCH WAS DONE AT ALL.
THERE WERE NO BODY FLUIDS COMING OUT OF HER MOUTH.
ROWS?  CARRIER'S?   HARD TO TAKE THIS SERIOUS BUT SINCE OTHERS DO, I WILL CONTINUE COMMENT.

He tied the door handle to a log grabber, bracing it to the foundation wall, his feet place against the concrete wall leaving his shoe prints on the salts coating on the wall.

NEITHER BPD NOR LOU SMIT NOR ANYONE ELSE HAS EVER SEEN THIS - PERSONALLY I THINK THISIS JUST INSANE.

Five minutes after the police arrived, they search the basement, walking up to this white door in plane sight, the officer pulls on the door and thinks the the door is painted shut. The killer and JonBenet was on the other side.

THE OFFICER DIDN'T OPEN THE DOOR BECAUSE THE LOCK WAS ON HIS SIDE AND NO ONE COULD HAVE BEEN IN THAT ROOM AND LOCKED IT FROM THE INSIDE.  ROSCOE DOESN'T THINK THINGS THROUGH AND IT IS CLEAR HE IS SO WRONG.

Fifteen minutes later a neighbor open this door and see nothing in the dark. It was not painted shut.
JonBenet lays on the cold, damp, unheated floor for seven more hours intill the police ask John to recheck the house. At 1:05 pm her finds her there wrap up like a papoose.
The killer did not hide JonBenet there , there was many better choices in the basement if he wanted to hide her, it was a quick place to hide them self from the police after the 911 call for help. He wired the door to the room shut. Not to hide JonBenet in the basement. But to Barracuda them from the police, and it work.
Understanding the crime scene
Team JBI

WHAT ELSE CAN I SAY - - ROSCOE'S THEORY DOESN'T FIR WITH THE EVIDENCE.

I AM NOT JUST HERE TO FIGHT THE BORG LIES BUT ALL LIES.  THEY DO NOTHING TO SERVE JUSTICE AND SOLVE THIS CRIME.

Reading the book, I found a few minor errors in the Ramsey chapters and will mention them here.  Overall, I thought the book was very interesting but wished he had gone further into the false witnesses involved in this case - namely Vassar Professor Don Foster and Seraph's Dale Yeager.

OK, so the minor issues.

Right off he describes the crime and says Linda Arndt asked John Ramsey to search the house - - then she says it was 30 minutes before the body was found.  I don't know exactly how long it took, but hearing John and Fleet describe that search, I would think it was more like 5 to 10 minutes.

Also said that in the early days, the DNA found in her panties was "unsuitable for DNA analysis" - and that is not true.  I have copies of the DNA reports from days after the murder - - and several people were cleared immediately based on the DNA found mixed with the blood of JonBenet - in her panties, left from the sexual assault.

He had a couple things that I can't say I know or do not know to be true.  But for the most part, he had stuff pretty well figured out.

He didn't really bring anything new to my attention but had a few stories that I had not heard before - I was entertained and think most would be by his small anecdotes.

During the Christmas party on the night of December 23rd, 1996, someone from the Ramsey house dialed 911 and then hung up.

No one publicly claimed responsibility for that call, but it has generally been accepted that the call was made by Fleet White - a mistake, not a call for help.

The police responded to the call. They rang the doorbell which was actually linked to the landline phone.  The phone was answered by a child who then gave the phone to Susan Stine.  She assured the police that everything was fine, there was no trouble there, and that ended the conversation. At that time Susan asked the other guests if they had called 911 and no one took credit for the call, but later Fleet said it may have been he misdialed.  

Some have speculated that the call was made by the killer who wanted to see how quickly police would respond to a 911 call.  

Personally, I really don't see that happening.  The killer, if he intended to leave that ransom note and actually take JonBenet from her house, would have already been far from the house when the note was found - - so what difference would it make if the police responded in 2 minutes, 10 or 20?  

Fleet White's mother was ill in another state and he was on the phone discussing and arranging necessary treatment options.  The phone had several lines out and it may be that he instinctively pressed 9 for an outside line (I really don't know) but accidental 911 calls are not at all rare or evidence of guilt.

I was asked about this call so decided to include the information here.  If anyone has something to add, post it or let me know via email.  jameson245@aol.com

First, let me say I am glad you have a Ramsey forum going, sorry I can't participate there but having been falsely accused of misdeeds on FB, I am banned.  So I will respond to a shared message here and hope you will see it.   Not sure if I will see any response made in FB, but you can email me if you want to respond to ME.

You wrote a long post saying you wouldn't have done this or that if YOU had been either John or Patsy that day.  Not knowing you, I won't question  what YOU would do.  And for the purpose of this thread, that doesn't matter.

You wrote, near the end of your post, "An every day working class family would have been fucked good & proper."

That statement touched me.  Unfortunately, you may be right, but not for the reasons you put forth.

The Ramseys were fortunate to have had a good friend in Mike Bynum who understood how dangerous it could be for innocent parents to allow themselves into the back room of an agency who clearly wanted to solve this quickly and were willing to bet the odds.  After all, a child so young has few enemies - - dead in her home, odds are it was a domestic incident.

The Ramseys were fortunate to have had a good friend, Mike Bynum, who understood how dangerous it could be for innocent and naïve (trusting totally in the BPD) people to volunteer to go to police headquarters for biased and aggressive interrogations by an agency HE  (Bynum) could see was already biased BORG.

I agree, without the benefit of a good friend like Mike, the Ramseys may well have been, as you put it, "fucked good and proper".

My question to you would be along these lines.

Does BORG really think the Ramseys did this horrible thing to their child (can they really ignore the evidence of an intruder and the DNA?)     or is the BORG just another chance for some middle class individuals to take a jab at someone who had more money and a nicer home and a private plane and a reprieve from cancer?

In getting to know some BORG, it seemed to me to be clear it was that - - - a chance to hurt someone who seemed to have a better life than the normal Joe and Joan.  

You wrote, "Money, influence, political corruption kept Ramsey's out of jail."

No, it wasn't their money - - the evidence just wasn't there - - and there IS clear and convincing evidence of an intruder.  The money helped, but if the evidence was there, the money would not have kept them out of jail.

Influence?  Again, no.  If influence could do all you think, it would have done a lot more than what we have today.  The cops would have said there was evidence of an intruder and let the case languish until cold.  But you think they used their influence to be constantly accused by different cops?  Nope - influence (which they clearly did not have) didn't help them.

Political corruption - - - there was no arrest because the physical evidence - including a man's DNA mixed with JOnBenet's blood in her panties and that unsourced hand print, the unsourced boot print, the unsourced handwriting......  there were no grounds for an arrest.  As for political corruption - - did everyone involved forget to tell the Governor and Mayor that the politically correct stand was Ramsey = innocence?  

Now, I will tell you there are other suspects, people whose families are old families in Boulder, people holding public positions (intentionally being obscure here) who look like good suspects to some PIs - - and THEY may have been protected by money, influence and political corruption.

Have you ever looked into any suspects not named Ramsey who might fit your description of the guilty parties here?

I decided to share this hateful post from another forum, to start a kind of collection showing how hateful the BORG could become when there was clear evidence of an intruder and the family was actually cleared by a district attorney in charge of the case.  This kind of hate really confuses me.


Blacchippie says:
March 3, 2017