jameson's Webbsleuths Forum
She shouldn't need funding - Printable Version

+- jameson's Webbsleuths Forum (http://www.webbsleuths.org)
+-- Forum: Welcome to the JonBenét Ramsey Forum (http://www.webbsleuths.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=101)
+--- Forum: Truth about Tricia Griffith and weBsleuths (http://www.webbsleuths.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=350)
+--- Thread: She shouldn't need funding (/showthread.php?tid=1092)



She shouldn't need funding - jameson245 - 09-19-2017

[attachment=368]


RE: She shouldn't need funding - jameson245 - 09-19-2017

[attachment=369]


RE: She shouldn't need funding - jameson245 - 09-19-2017

Friday, 27 March 2015
Congratulations TRICIA!!

Settlement.

100% ownership goes to Tricia.


RE: She shouldn't need funding - jameson245 - 09-19-2017

I see the posts that she is asking for funds to pay for the web site. I believe those donating are being taken advantage of.

Just saying.


RE: She shouldn't need funding - Gemini6 - 09-20-2017

(09-19-2017, 10:44 PM)jameson245 Wrote: I see the posts that she is asking for funds to pay for the web site.  I believe those donating are being taken advantage of.  

Just saying.

I agree. Just saying...


RE: She shouldn't need funding - Summer Dawn - 09-22-2017

Funny how everyone bashes you for raising money to find JonBenets killer(which is 100% legit) yet she raises money for her website and no one bats an eye.


Can't get more BORG - jameson245 - 06-23-2019

Documenting -   This is lifted directly from the webbsleuths forum

Open for Discussion/ The 3 People in the House when JonBenet Died
Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by Tricia, Sep 11, 2016.

 

Thread Status: Not open for further replies.

  1.  [Image: 794.jpg?1536475588]  
    Tricia Owner Websleuths.com
    Staff MemberAdministrator
  2. Messages:
    26,225
  3. Likes Received:
    21,378
  4. Trophy Points:
    113 Dear Websleuths Members, Our rules at Websleuths are rarely black and white. Many time we have to adjust rules for certain forums. One rule we do our best to follow is who is allowed to be discussed when it comes to the particular crime committed. We discuss possible perpetrators based on the mainstream media and police reports. We do not allow posters to drag innocent people into a discussion and accuse them of a crime. Because of this rule, we only discuss John, Patsy, and Burke Ramsey in this forum. Those three people have not been cleared by the police and the current District Attorney. There is nothing to suggest an intruder. The DNA is a red herring. Look at the note, the pineapple, all the evidence in the house, the behavior of the three people in the house, look at all these things. Until all of these things can be explained and logical evidence is offered to show an intruder we will not allow innocent people to be discussed as the possible killer. Just like any other forum on Websleuths. Thank you, Tricia Griffith Owner/Websleuths.com



RE: Can't get more BORG - Dave - 06-24-2019

(06-23-2019, 01:17 PM)jameson245 Wrote: Jams quoting weBsleuths (Tricia, I assume): "We do not allow posters to drag innocent people into a discussion and accuse them of a crime.   Because of this rule, we only discuss John, Patsy, and Burke Ramsey in this forum.   Those three people have not been cleared by the police and the current District Attorney."

This is definitely dim-witted BORG logic.  In this country (USA), people are presumed innocent until proven guilty, so Tricia's weBsleuths are not actually following their rule at all by dragging John, Patsy, and Burke into discussions.  Furthermore, the claim that "those three people have not been cleared" is true of over six billion people, not just the Ramseys, so this cannot be used as an excuse to discuss only them.

The abject failure of human reasoning in this case by so many people (including "pseudo-experts") never ceases to amaze me.