Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
straydog77
#2
The Boulder Police Department--the people who actually investigated the evidence from the crime scene--have never eliminated the Ramseys as suspects.

BUT THE SAME PEOPLE COULDN'T MAKE A CASE AGAINST THE RAMSEYS EITHER - THE GRAND JURY DID NOT VOTE TO INDICT THEM FOR MURDER OR MANSLAUGHTER. THEY INDICTED THEM FOR NOT LOCKING THE DOORS, NOT CHECKING THE WINDOWS, NOT SLEEPING CLOSE ENOUGH THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO HEAR HER SNEEZE. THEY INDICTED THE RAMSEYS FOR NOT TELLING THE POLICE WHO DID IT SO ALLOWING THE KILLER TO GO FREE.

MEANWHILE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY WHO HAD ACCESS TO ALL THE FILES REFUSED TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE HE KNEW THE "KEY WITNESS" ACCORDING TO STEVE THOMAS, LARRY SCHILLER AND CAROL MCKINLEY HAD BEEN DISCREDITED BY SOME RANDOM NC HOUSEWIFE.


The Grand Jury--which had the power to subpoena evidence even the Police did not have access to--voted to charge John and Patsy Ramsey with multiple felonies.

COVERED IN THE LAST RESPONSE BUT I WOULD ADD IT IS REGRETABLE THAT THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF THE GRAND JURY DID NOT USE THE GJ'S POWERS TO BEST ADVANTAGE. DIDN'T DO THE INVESTIGATION MANY OF US HAD HOPED FOR. DIDN'T INVITE THE RAMSEYS IN TO TALK/QUESTION. THE GJ WS SET UP TO RAILROAD THE PARENTS - I HAVE NO DOUBT OF THAT.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
straydog77 - by jameson245 - 12-04-2019, 12:54 PM
RE: straydog77 - by jameson245 - 12-04-2019, 01:13 PM
RE: straydog77 - by jameson245 - 12-04-2019, 01:33 PM
RE: straydog77 - by jameson245 - 12-04-2019, 01:53 PM
RE: straydog77 - by jameson245 - 12-04-2019, 02:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)