12-04-2019, 01:53 PM
The sexual assault was hidden and not discovered until the autopsy. The genital area had been thoroughly wiped clean of blood and Jonbenet was fully dressed when found.
HOW IS THIS EVIDENCE OF RAMSEY GUILT? HIDDEN OR NOT, THERE IS FOREIGN DNA CO-MINGLED WITH HER BLOOD - BLOOD RESULTING FROM THE SEXUAL ASSAULT. THAT IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE FACT THAT NO ONE WAS SURE THERE WAS A SEXUAL ASSAULT UNTIL THE AUTOPSY.
In addition to the concealment of the sexual assault, the ransom note made reference to a motive that was clearly made up: political and financial gain by foreign terrorists "S.B.T.C.". The note contained no mention of any sexual motive.
SO YOU THINK PARENTS WHO KILLED THEIR DAUGHTER KNOWING THERE WAS A SEXUAL ASSAULT (SHE WAS ALIVE WHEN ASSAULTED) WROTE A NOTE INDICATING THIS WAS AGAINST JOHN'S BUSINESS BUT SHOULD HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT THE SEXUAL ASSAULT? I DON'T GET WHERE YOU ARE GOING WITH THIS.
John and Patsy Ramsey continued to deny that Jonbenet had been sexually assaulted (even on the night of her death) for many years after the crime.
NOT FOR MANY YEARS. BUT YES, FOR A WHILE, BECAUSE THE COPS DIDN'T RELEASE THAT INFORMATION TO THEM. HAD THE PARENTS KNOWN ABOUT THE SEXUAL ASSAULT, THE COPS WOULD HAVE GONE, "AHAA!" ONCE TOLD SHE HAD BEEN ASSAULTED, THEY WERE PERHAPS IN DENIAL FOR A WHILE, BUT THEY EVENTUALLY WERE FORCED TO ACCEPT IT.
Jonbenet was found wearing oversized underwear, several sizes larger than the other 15 pairs found in her underwear drawer. Patsy said the oversized underwear were originally purchased for an older cousin, but claimed she had put them in Jonbenet’s drawer for her to use. She had no explanation for why no other larger-size underwear were found in that drawer.
THEY WERE BOUGHT FOR COUSIN JENNY, THE NAMES OF THE WEEK WAS EXCITING TO JBR AS SHE WAS IN KINDERGARTEN AND KNEW THE DAYS OF THE WEEK, SO PATSY LET HER KEEP THEM. SO YES, THEY WERE THE ONLY LARGER PANTIES - 7 PAIRS. THE REST OF THE PACKAGE WAS IN THE BEDROOM OR BATHROOM, I AM NOT SURE EXACTLY WHERE BUT THEY ENDED UP IN A LAWYER'S OFFICE AT SOME POINT. I DON'T BELIEVE THE BPD TOOK THE PACKAGE WHEN THEY SHOULD HAVE.
At least six medical experts agreed there were conclusive signs Jonbenet had been sexually abused prior to the night of her death. Not one medical professional has come forward to dispute the reasoning of Dr McCann, the expert consulted by police.
UNTRUE - BUT YOU KNOW THAT AS WELL AS I. THAT DISCUSSION IS WELL DOCUMENTED AND I WON'T TAKE THE TIME TO DO IT HERE.
John and Patsy Ramsey both completely changed their stories after their initial four months of non-cooperation. John drastically changed his story about reading to Jonbenet before bed, while Patsy drastically changed her story about Jonbenet’s clothing, and whether she searched Jonbenet’s room or found the note first.
NOPE, THE STORIES ABOUT READING TO THE KIDS AND THE RED SHIRT WERE CONFUSED IN THE VERY BEGINNING WHEN DIFFERENT COPS WROTE CONFLICTING REPORTS. IT APPEARS THE RAMSEYS DIDN'T CHANGE THE STORIES, THE COPS WERE OVERWHELMED, CONFUSED AND WROTE THEIR REPORTS HOURS, EVEN DAYS AFTER THE EVENT.
Burke Ramsey’s story contradicted that of his parents in several key details--notably, he said Jonbenet was awake when she got home.
WHEN QUESTIONED IT WAS CLEAR BURKE WAS CONFUSING CHRISTMAS EVE AND CHRISTMAS NIGHT. HE CORRECTED ONE ERROR WHEN HE SAID THEY VISITED THE STAR ON Christmas NIGHT AND THEN TOOK IT BACK AND SAID NO, THAT WAS THE NIGHT BEFORE.
Some audio analysts consulted by police claimed that Burke Ramsey’s voice was on the 911 call.
BUT NONE HAVE TESTIFIED TO THAT EFFECT OR MADE ANY SUCH REPORT PUBLIC - IT'S ALL GOSSIP AND RUMOR, NOT EVIDENCE. THE TAPE IS PUBLIC, THE ENHANCED TAPED HAVE DIFFERENT TRANSCRIPTS. IN DEPOSITION, NEITHER POLICE CHIEF BECKNER NOR DA ALEX HUNTER HAVE SAID THERE WAS A THIRD VOICE. NOT JOHN'S, NOT BURKE'S.
HOW IS THIS EVIDENCE OF RAMSEY GUILT? HIDDEN OR NOT, THERE IS FOREIGN DNA CO-MINGLED WITH HER BLOOD - BLOOD RESULTING FROM THE SEXUAL ASSAULT. THAT IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE FACT THAT NO ONE WAS SURE THERE WAS A SEXUAL ASSAULT UNTIL THE AUTOPSY.
In addition to the concealment of the sexual assault, the ransom note made reference to a motive that was clearly made up: political and financial gain by foreign terrorists "S.B.T.C.". The note contained no mention of any sexual motive.
SO YOU THINK PARENTS WHO KILLED THEIR DAUGHTER KNOWING THERE WAS A SEXUAL ASSAULT (SHE WAS ALIVE WHEN ASSAULTED) WROTE A NOTE INDICATING THIS WAS AGAINST JOHN'S BUSINESS BUT SHOULD HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT THE SEXUAL ASSAULT? I DON'T GET WHERE YOU ARE GOING WITH THIS.
John and Patsy Ramsey continued to deny that Jonbenet had been sexually assaulted (even on the night of her death) for many years after the crime.
NOT FOR MANY YEARS. BUT YES, FOR A WHILE, BECAUSE THE COPS DIDN'T RELEASE THAT INFORMATION TO THEM. HAD THE PARENTS KNOWN ABOUT THE SEXUAL ASSAULT, THE COPS WOULD HAVE GONE, "AHAA!" ONCE TOLD SHE HAD BEEN ASSAULTED, THEY WERE PERHAPS IN DENIAL FOR A WHILE, BUT THEY EVENTUALLY WERE FORCED TO ACCEPT IT.
Jonbenet was found wearing oversized underwear, several sizes larger than the other 15 pairs found in her underwear drawer. Patsy said the oversized underwear were originally purchased for an older cousin, but claimed she had put them in Jonbenet’s drawer for her to use. She had no explanation for why no other larger-size underwear were found in that drawer.
THEY WERE BOUGHT FOR COUSIN JENNY, THE NAMES OF THE WEEK WAS EXCITING TO JBR AS SHE WAS IN KINDERGARTEN AND KNEW THE DAYS OF THE WEEK, SO PATSY LET HER KEEP THEM. SO YES, THEY WERE THE ONLY LARGER PANTIES - 7 PAIRS. THE REST OF THE PACKAGE WAS IN THE BEDROOM OR BATHROOM, I AM NOT SURE EXACTLY WHERE BUT THEY ENDED UP IN A LAWYER'S OFFICE AT SOME POINT. I DON'T BELIEVE THE BPD TOOK THE PACKAGE WHEN THEY SHOULD HAVE.
At least six medical experts agreed there were conclusive signs Jonbenet had been sexually abused prior to the night of her death. Not one medical professional has come forward to dispute the reasoning of Dr McCann, the expert consulted by police.
UNTRUE - BUT YOU KNOW THAT AS WELL AS I. THAT DISCUSSION IS WELL DOCUMENTED AND I WON'T TAKE THE TIME TO DO IT HERE.
John and Patsy Ramsey both completely changed their stories after their initial four months of non-cooperation. John drastically changed his story about reading to Jonbenet before bed, while Patsy drastically changed her story about Jonbenet’s clothing, and whether she searched Jonbenet’s room or found the note first.
NOPE, THE STORIES ABOUT READING TO THE KIDS AND THE RED SHIRT WERE CONFUSED IN THE VERY BEGINNING WHEN DIFFERENT COPS WROTE CONFLICTING REPORTS. IT APPEARS THE RAMSEYS DIDN'T CHANGE THE STORIES, THE COPS WERE OVERWHELMED, CONFUSED AND WROTE THEIR REPORTS HOURS, EVEN DAYS AFTER THE EVENT.
Burke Ramsey’s story contradicted that of his parents in several key details--notably, he said Jonbenet was awake when she got home.
WHEN QUESTIONED IT WAS CLEAR BURKE WAS CONFUSING CHRISTMAS EVE AND CHRISTMAS NIGHT. HE CORRECTED ONE ERROR WHEN HE SAID THEY VISITED THE STAR ON Christmas NIGHT AND THEN TOOK IT BACK AND SAID NO, THAT WAS THE NIGHT BEFORE.
Some audio analysts consulted by police claimed that Burke Ramsey’s voice was on the 911 call.
BUT NONE HAVE TESTIFIED TO THAT EFFECT OR MADE ANY SUCH REPORT PUBLIC - IT'S ALL GOSSIP AND RUMOR, NOT EVIDENCE. THE TAPE IS PUBLIC, THE ENHANCED TAPED HAVE DIFFERENT TRANSCRIPTS. IN DEPOSITION, NEITHER POLICE CHIEF BECKNER NOR DA ALEX HUNTER HAVE SAID THERE WAS A THIRD VOICE. NOT JOHN'S, NOT BURKE'S.